Abstract
In this review article, it is emphasized that adopting advanced molecular diagnostics is essential for modern UTI management, offering a more comprehensive, accurate, and rapid approach compared to traditional methods. Standard urine culture’s limitations include low sensitivity and failure to culture certain microorganisms, leading to undiagnosed cases and increased morbidity. Advanced molecular techniques, like multiplex-PCR and pooled antibiotic susceptibility testing have been shown to reduce empiric treatments and negative outcomes significantly. And advanced molecular methods like metagenomics (mNGS) offer comprehensive pathogen detection without prior knowledge of target organisms, improving diagnostic yield. These methods also detect antibiotic resistance genes, aiding in precise treatment strategies and improving patient outcomes. Adopting advanced molecular diagnostics is essential for modern UTI management, offering a more comprehensive, accurate, and rapid approach compared to traditional methods. These technologies are vital in improving patient care and combating antibiotic-resistant infections.
Description
Copyright © 2024 The Author(s): This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium for non-commercial use provided the original author and source are credited.
Publisher
South Asian Research Publication
Date of publication
Summer 6-26-2024
Language
english
Persistent identifier
http://hdl.handle.net/10950/4727
Document Type
Article
Recommended Citation
Carpenter, R. E. (2024). Beyond standard urine culture: Advanced molecular testing for urinary tract infections. SAR Journal of Medicine. 5(3), 80-86. https://doi.org/10.36346/sarjm.2024.v05i03.003
Publisher Citation
Rob E. Carpenter (2024). Beyond Standard Urine Culture: Advanced Molecular Testing for Urinary Tract Infections, SAR J Med, 5(3), 80-86.