Event Title

Emotional Learning Using Facial Expression

Presenter Information

Chloe Gasper
Robert Pierce
Greyson Givens

Loading...

Media is loading
 

Document Type

Poster Presentation

Date of Publication

4-17-2020

Abstract

The Conceptual Act Theory (Barrett, 2006) holds that specific emotion words are arbitrary culturally-learned labels for an array of emotional pleasantness, intensity, and physical symptoms rather than terms for natural categories that exist in the body and mind. To test the of the theory, we divided participants (n=20 recruited online) into two groups: Group 1 saw English words and emotional faces, whereas Group 2 saw nonwords alongside the faces. During training, both groups viewed words/non-words alongside a corresponding emotional face. In testing, both groups viewed only the words/non-words without the faces. Participants in both groups judged the pleasantness and emotional intensity of each word. Preliminary linear mixed model analyses showed that both groups responded similarly to the words and non-words during testing. This may indicate that participants learned the emotional value of the novel, arbitrary nonwords. Data collection is still ongoing.

Keywords

emotion word, emotional intensity, conceptual act theory

Persistent Identifier

http://hdl.handle.net/10950/2569

Share

COinS
 
Apr 17th, 12:00 AM Apr 17th, 12:00 AM

Emotional Learning Using Facial Expression

The Conceptual Act Theory (Barrett, 2006) holds that specific emotion words are arbitrary culturally-learned labels for an array of emotional pleasantness, intensity, and physical symptoms rather than terms for natural categories that exist in the body and mind. To test the of the theory, we divided participants (n=20 recruited online) into two groups: Group 1 saw English words and emotional faces, whereas Group 2 saw nonwords alongside the faces. During training, both groups viewed words/non-words alongside a corresponding emotional face. In testing, both groups viewed only the words/non-words without the faces. Participants in both groups judged the pleasantness and emotional intensity of each word. Preliminary linear mixed model analyses showed that both groups responded similarly to the words and non-words during testing. This may indicate that participants learned the emotional value of the novel, arbitrary nonwords. Data collection is still ongoing.