Abstract
Despite remarkable economic development in South Korea (Korea), there are only a few women leaders, and they face challenges in the gendered workplace where organizational constraints and traditional values coexist. In a reanalysis of narratives of Korean women leaders (KWLs), using an ideal-type analysis as a novel qualitative research method, we identified five types of KWLs' resistance to their token status in the workplace: (1) Opportunity-Driven, (2) Pathfinding, (3) Self-Reflective, (4) Persevering, and (5) Changing the Way to Resist. The five types broaden the meaning of KWLs' resistance and highlight different ways they resist their token status in the workplace. A significant finding is that all KWLs have persevered in their own way, whether their resistance is overt (active), as in Type 1 (Opportunity-Driven), or covert (passive), as in Type 4 (Persevering), which is not considered resistance in Western contexts as it is subtle and hidden. This study also revealed that KWLs' personal agency plays an important role in shaping resistance strategies, though it is limited by organizational context and is possible after they gain executive power in the organization. We provide implications for research such as the importance of culture in typology development and implications for practice at the individual and organizational level.
Description
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. © 2025 The Author(s). Human Resource Development Quarterly published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Publisher
WILEY
Date of publication
7-2025
Language
english
Persistent identifier
http://hdl.handle.net/10950/4980
Document Type
Article
Recommended Citation
Cho, Yonjoo; Park, Jiwon; Lee, Sumi; and Yoon, Sokyum, "Developing a Typology of Korean Women Leaders' Resistance to Their Token Status in the Workplace" (2025). Human Resource Development Faculty Publications and Presentations. Paper 64.
http://hdl.handle.net/10950/4980